SUMMARY OF FIVE YEAR PLANS IN INDIA
SINCE INDEPENDENCE , THE INDIAN ECONOMY HAS BEEN PREMISED ON THE CONCEPT OF PLANNING. THIS HAS BEEN CARRIED THROUGH THE FIVE YEAR PLANS , DEVELOPED , EXECUTED , AND MONITORED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WITH THE PRIME MINISTER AS THE EX-OFFICIO CHAIRMAN , THE COMMISSION HAS A NOMINATED DEPUTY CHAIRMAN , WHO HOLDS THE RANK OF A CABINET MINISTER. MONTEK SINGH AHLUWALIA IS CURRENTLY THE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMISSION.TWELFTH PLAN IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY.
HERE IS SUMMARY OF ALL FIVE YEAR PLAN:
PLAN
|
DURATION
|
OBJECTIVE
|
NOTES
|
FIRST PLAN
|
1951-56
|
DEVOLOPMENT IN AGRICULTURE
|
IT WAS BASED ON HARROD-DOMAR MODEL.
|
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM LAUNCHED IN 1952
|
|||
FOCUS ON AGRICULTURE , PRICE STABILITY , POWER AND TRANSPORT
|
|||
IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL PLAN PRIMARLY BECAUSE OF GOOD HARVESTS IN THE
LAST TWO YEARS OF THE PLAN
|
|||
SECOND PLAN
|
1956-61
|
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
|
ALSO CALLED MAHALANOBIS PLAN NAMED AFTER THE WELL KNOWN ECONOMIST
|
FOCUS-RAPID INDUSTRIALIZATION
|
|||
ADVOCATED HUGE IMPORTS THROUGH FOREIGN LOANS.
|
|||
SHIFTED BASIC EMPHASIS FROM AGRICULTURE TO INDUSTRY FAR TOO SOON.
|
|||
DURING THIS PLAN , PRICES INCREASED BY 30 %, AGAINST A DECLINE OF 13
% DURING THE FIRST PLAN
|
|||
TARGET GROWTH : 4.5%
ACTUAL GROWTH :4.27 %
|
|||
THIRD PLAN
|
1961-1966
|
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
|
AT ITS CONCEPTION , IT WAS FELT THAT INDIAN ECONOMY HAS ENTERED A
TAKE-OFF STAGE.THEREFORE , ITS AIM WAS TO MAKE INDIA A ‘SELF RELIANT’ AND
‘SELF GENERATING’ ECONOMY
|
BASED ON THE EXPERIENCE OF FIRST TWO PLANS , AGRICULTURE WAS GIVEN
TOP PRIORITY TO SUPPORT THE EXPORTS AND INDUSTRY.
|
|||
CAMPLETE FAILURE IN REACHING THE TARGETS DUE TO UNFORESEEN EVENTS
|
|||
TARGET GROWTH: 5.6 %
ACTUAL GROWTH: 2.84 %
|
|||
THREE ANNUAL PLANS ( PLAN HOLIDAY FOR 3 YEARS )
|
1966-69
|
AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT
|
PREVAILING CRISIS IN AGRICULTURE AND SERIOUS FOOD SHORTAGE
NECESSITATED THE EMPHASIS ON AGRICULTURE DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS
|
DURING THESE PLANS A WHOLE NEW AGRICULTURAL STRATEGY WAS IMPLEMENTED.
IT INVOLVING WIDE-SPREAD DISTRIBUTION OF HIGH-YEILDING VARIETIES OF SEEDS,
EXTENSIVE USE OF FERTILIZERS.
|
|||
DURING THE ANNUAL PLANS , THE
ECONOMY ABSORBED THE SHOCKES GENERATED DURING THE THIRD PLAN
|
|||
IT PAVED THE PATH FOR THE PLANNED GROWTH AHEAD.
|
|||
FOURTH PLAN
|
1969-74
|
STABLE DEVELOPMENT
|
MAIN EMPHASIS WAS ON GROWTH RATE OF AGRICULTURE TO ENABLE OTHER
SECTORS TO MOVE FORWARD
|
FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE PLAN SAW RECORD PRODUCTION. THE LAST THREE
YEARS DID NOT MEASURE UP DUE TO POOR MONSOON
|
|||
INFLUX OF BANGLADESHI REFUGEES BEFORE AND AFTER 1971 INDO-PAK WAR AS
IMPORTANT ISSUE
|
|||
TARGET GROWTH: 5.7 %
ACTUAL GROWTH:3.30 %
|
|||
FIFTH PLAN
|
1974-79
|
ERADICATION OF POVERTY
|
THE FIFTH PLAN WAS PREPARED AND LAUNCHED BY D.D.DHAR
|
IT PROPOSED TO ACHIEVE TWO MAIN OBJECTIVES: ‘ REMOVAL OF POVERTY’ (
GARIBI HATAO ) AND ‘ATTAINMENT OF SELF RELIANCE’
|
|||
PROMOTION OF HIGH RATE OF GROWTH ,
BETTER DISTRIBUTION OF INCOME AND SIGNIFICANT GROWTH IN THE DOMESTIC
RATE OF SAVINGS WERE SEEN AS KEY INSTRUMENTS
|
|||
THE PLAN WAS TERMINATEDIN 1978 (INSTEAD OF 1979) WHEN JANTA PARTY
GOVT.ROSE TO POWER.
|
|||
TARGET GROWTH: 4.4 %
ACTUAL GROWTH: 3.8 %
|
|||
SIXTH PLAN
|
1980-95
|
ERADICATION OF POVERTY AND UNEMPLOYMENT
|
FOCUS ON INCREASE IN NATIONAL INCOME , MODERNIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY
, ENSURING CONTINUOUS DECREASE IN
POVERTY AND UNEMPLOYMENT , POPULATION CONTROL THROUGH FAMILY PLANNING ..etc
|
TARGET GROWTH : 5.2 %
ACTUAL GROWTH : 5.66 %
|
|||
SEVENTH PLAN
|
1985-1990
|
ERADICATION OF POVERTY
|
FOCUS ON RAPID GROWTH IN FOOD- GRAINS
PRODUCTION , INCREASED EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES AND PRODUCTIVITY
WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF BASIC TENANTS OF PLANNING.
|
THE PLAN WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL , THE ECONOMY RECORDED 6 % GROWTH
|
|||
TARGET GROWTH : 5 %
ACTUAL GROWTH :6.01%
|
|||
EIGHTH PLAN
|
1992-1997
|
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
|
THE PLAN WAS POSTPONED BY TWO YEARS BECAUSE OF POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY
AT THE CENTRE.
|
WORSENING BALANCE OF PAYMENT POSITION AND INFLATION DURING 1990-91
WERE THE KEY ISSUES DURING THE LAUNCH OF THE PLAN
|
|||
THE PLAN UNDERTOOK DRASTIC POLICY MEASURES TO COMBAT THE BAD ECONOMIC
SITUATION AND TO UNDERTAKE AN ANNUAL AVERAGE GROWTH OF 5.6 %
|
|||
SOME OF THE MAIN ECONOMIC OUTCOMES DURING EIGHTH PLAN PERIOD WERE
RAPID ECONOMIC GROWTH , HIGH GROWTH OF AGRICULTURE AND ALLIED SECTOR , AND
MANUFACTURING SECTOR , GROWTH IN EXPORTS AND IMPORTS , IMPROVEMENT IN TRADE
AND CURRENT ACCOUNT DEFICIT.
|
|||
NINTH PLAN
|
1997-2002
|
INCREASE IN GROWTH RATE
|
IT WAS DEVELOPED IN THE CONTEXT OF FOUR IMPORTANT DIMENSIONS: QUALITY
OF LIFE , GENERATION OF PRODUCTIVE EMPLOYMENT , REGIONAL BALANCE AND SELF-
RELIANCE.
|
TARGET GRWOTH : 6.5 %
ACTUAL GROWTH :5.35 %
|
|||
TENTH PLAN
|
2002-2007
|
ERADICATION OF POVERTY AND CREATION OF JOB OPPORTUNITIES
|
8 % AVERAGE GDP GROWTH FOR THE PERIOD
|
MORE INVESTOR FRIENDLY FLEXIBLE ECONOMIC REFORMS
|
|||
UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO PRIMARY EDUCATION
|
|||
CREATION OF 50 MILLIN EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE PLAN PERIOD.
|
|||
MOBILIZING AND OPTIMIZING ALL FINANCIAL RESOURCES.
|
|||
ELEVENTH PLAN
|
2007-2012
|
DEVELOPMENT IN PRIMARY FACILITY
|
ACCELERATE GDP GROWTH FROM 8 5 TO 10 %
|
REDUCE DROPOUT RATES OF
CHILDREN FROM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM 52.2% TO 20 % BY 2012
|
|||
CREATE 70 MILLION NEW WORK OPPORTUNITIES
|
|||
ENSURE ELECTRICITY CONNECTION
TO ALL VILLAGES
|
|||
TWELTH PLAN
|
2012-2017
|
STABLE DEVELOPMENT
|
AVERAGE GROWTH RATE HAS BEEN SET AT 8.2 %
|
GROWTH RATE HAS BEEN LOWERED TO 8.2 % FROM THE 9 % PROJECTED EARLIER.
|
|||
SEEKS TO ACHIEVE 4 % AGRICULTURE SECTOR GROWTH DURING THE PLAN PERIOD
|
|||
PLANS TO BRING DOWN THE POVERTY RATIO BY 10 %
|
|||
THE OUTLAY ON HEALTH WOULD INCLUDE INCREASED SPENDING IN RELATED
AREAS OF DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION.
|
I am thankful to you for sharing this awesome article with this helpful knowledge.It is a very useful article about the 5 year plans.
ReplyDelete